Biochemical View evaluation form

Non-related to teaching professionals evaluation form


Name (optional): E-mail (optional): Instituition (optional):
Formation: Course(optional) : Year of conclusion(optional):


Áreas de atuação profissional(mark all the options that apply)
Medicine Veterinary medicine
Odontologia

Fisioterapia
Pharmacy

Clinical analysis
Biology Other (wich?)



In which situations have you already used the site? (mark all the options that apply)
For update (general)
For update about specific concepts
To clarify a doubt
To get data for a project
 
About your use of the site:

This is the first time I visit the site.

I haven't found something I was looking for (tell us what):

Commentaries:

Use the following criterion:
Choose 1 to 5 according to how much you agree to each sentence

1 = I totally disagree; 5= I totally agrre.

1- About the contents  
  It lacks some topics, so I can't review all the contents I'm looking for just using the site.
  Suggestion of topics to be inserted
  The boarding is superficial. I need a deeper level of information.
  The site is useful to depeen knowledge obtained from other sources.
  Commentaries
2- About the menu:  
  The contents are grouped in a way that facilitates the integration of them.
  The navigation throught the site is easily self-directed.
  It was easy to find specific topics that I looked for.
  Commentaries
4- About the bidimensional format of the pathways:  
  The format they are presented is easily understandable.
  Since they are complete, they have helped me to understand and to complement what I've learned before.
  They are very extensive, so they confused me a little.
  They have not added much to what I have already already Known, so I should note use them to study in the future.
  The regulation points are very helpful on understanding the pathways.
  I agree that texts should be associated to the regulation points when it's possible.
  The texts linked to the regulation points helps on understading them but do not make the studying boring.
  Commentaries
5- About the tridimensional format of the pathways:  
  It was useful to see the spacial structure of the molecules in an interactive way.
  I was not interested for this visualization format.

  This visualization format facilitated the comprehension of each step of the pathways (the modifications that the molecules are passing by).
  Commentaries
6- About the text pages:  
  They repeat the contents of the book and other sites, so they do not add much to my previous knowledge.
  They were helpful on understanding the pathways, but objectively, so I still need to usesome books for a complete study.
  I'd use them to review some contents.
  They didn't help much. I still have a lot of doubts.
  The pathways are explained in a very understandable way.
  The drawings and the schemes have helped me to understand the text.
  I don't think the figures and schemes are necessary, since there's already some text to explain the pathways.
  Commentaries
7- General evaluation:  
  The site has ggiven me some valuable information.
  OThe tools available can help me on understanding all the concepts I have to learn/review.
  I think the site is not necessary, since I’m already using text books.
8- Critical and suggestions  
   




 

DHTML JavaScript Menu Courtesy of Milonic.com